"Search engine optimization, the practice of trying to get your sites web siteto rank higher in search engines, is not spam. Google does not hate SEO."
Labels: Google
Posted by Matthew Elshaw at 2:12 AM GMT | View Post | 1 Comments
"In our view, such an arrangement with the dominant search provider would make an acquisition of Yahoo! undesirable to us."
Labels: Google, Yahoo
Posted by Matthew Elshaw at 2:02 AM GMT | View Post | 0 Comments
Posted by Matthew Elshaw at 1:10 AM GMT | View Post | 6 Comments
In the past few months we have been exploring some HTML forms to try to discover new web pages and URLs that we otherwise couldn't find and index for users who search on Google. Specifically, when we encounter a <form> element on a high-quality site, we might choose to do a small number of queries using the form.... If we ascertain that the web page resulting from our query is valid, interesting, and includes content not in our index, we may include it in our index much as we would include any other web page.
Posted by Matthew Elshaw at 6:27 AM GMT | View Post | 0 Comments
Posted by Matthew Elshaw at 12:01 AM GMT | View Post | 2 Comments
Posted by Matthew Elshaw at 11:57 PM GMT | View Post | 0 Comments
"My site grabbed rankings at 1, 2, 3 and 4 within 2 hours and maintained spots 1, 3 and 4 until sometime Wednesday. As of right now, it has received over 2000 Diggs and 300,000 page impressions"
Posted by Matthew Elshaw at 4:53 AM GMT | View Post | 0 Comments
Posted by Rene LeMerle at 9:08 AM GMT | View Post | 0 Comments
Labels: ebay, Free Tools, Google, Yahoo
Posted by Lara Appelhans at 5:18 AM GMT | View Post | 0 Comments
"The reality is, this is something we do all the time. We always experiment with our marketing mix on eBay. We turned off our advertising through AdWords to see how it affects that."
"After speaking with officials at eBay, we at Google agreed that it was better for us not to feature this event during the eBay Live conference."
Labels: ebay, Google, Google AdSense
Posted by Matthew Elshaw at 4:44 AM GMT | View Post | 1 Comments
Is this a case of Anti-trust deja vu? Search giant Google is taking Microsoft to case over its new Windows Vista operating system, claiming the operating system unfairly inhibits users from using alternative applications.
Cast your minds back to the late 90's and you will recall a similar case involving Microsoft, and then browser competitor Netscape. Claims were raised that the pre-installed Internet Explorer browser disadvantaged other internet browser manufacturers. Back then, the courts found in favor of Netscape, which was then owned by AOL, but the damage was done, and Internet Explorer went on to become the leading browser, leaving Netscape in the shadows.
Google are threatening to take on Microsoft again in the Anti-trust arena. Google are alleging that Windows Vista places other desktop search applications at a disadvantage, as Vista comes with its own desktop search function, and changing the Microsoft default is difficult to action.
This isn't the first time Google has threatened to take on Microsoft over unfair competition. When Microsoft launched IE7 with MSN Search preinstalled, Google waved the anti-trust flag. But this ongoing anti-trust sledging match is starting to wear thin.
Let's face it - when you're one of the most successful tech companies in recent history, and you have a serious grip on the search advertising market, the likelihood of the DOJ (department of justice) finding in favor of the claims is unlikely. The legal system is more likely to view the claims as a school yard tantrum.
It's reached the point where Google needs to consider setting up its own operating system, or partner with another company to gain default rights on their platform. Their recent deal with Dell, which sees Google Software pre-installed, is more likely to successfully combat any disadvantages that Microsoft Vista might present.
With all the recent rumors about Google and Apple partnerships, a Google based operating system might not be far off...
Posted by Rene LeMerle at 2:04 PM GMT | View Post | 0 Comments
Quality guidelines - specific guidelines
If a site doesn't meet our quality guidelines, it may be blocked from the index. If you determine that your site doesn't meet these guidelines, you can modify your site so that it does and then submit your site for reinclusion.
IMPORTANT NOTE: While Google suggests that once you've remedied any guideline wrong doings, you can submit your site for reinclusion, the time to get re-listed in their index can take as long as it did to get included in the first place (2-3 months for some sites). So it's a simple lesson - avoid the penalty in the first place.
Posted by Rene LeMerle at 11:19 AM GMT | View Post | 0 Comments
"...these are all images that anyone could go out and take with a camera. We do take great care that if someone did feel their privacy was invaded, there is a way that they can easily tell us about it and we'll remove it right away. But all the pictures are taken in public areas where anyone could go [and] take a picture."
Posted by Lara Appelhans at 6:10 AM GMT | View Post | 2 Comments
"The future of the web is about personalization. Where search was dominant, now the web is about 'me.' It's about weaving the web together in a way that is smart and personalized for the user"
"They're basically admitting defeat." "They've realized they can't compete with Google on search."
Posted by Matthew Elshaw at 2:40 AM GMT | View Post | 2 Comments